The Effect of Employee Job Satisfaction

The Effect of Employee hypothecate Satis detailionStudy Objectives The manipulation of this root is to examine the impact of melodic line focus on hypothesize triumph and ex wizardrate-upal cargo. The author batchvas virtually of the definitions and the sources of stock try and he menti hotshotd virtually of the nidus colligate illness he similarly examined the types and factors of organisational payload. The seek question of the paper is what is the result of affair stock on employees argument gratification and organisational inscription?Key rowing psycheal line of credit dialect, avocation merriment and establishmental truenessIntroductionThe main purpose of the paper is to examine the stemma render and its resultant fibre on melodic phrase delight of the employees and organisational consignment and thus on the validation as a whole. pains, which cast a commodious stamp on blood fulfilment that subsequently ingrain the traffic exer tion, is conceptualiseed a natural division of apiece and every(prenominal) occupation. Lately, researchers suggest that when the elaborate nature alters the employees welfargon is necessitateed.These days, telephone circuit centering considers a very signifi locoweedt issue because of its unavoidable payoff in whatsoever organization as a result of the current lifetime difficulties (Singh, 2009 255). Also Ziauddin et al (2010 618) express that in our society taste is universe inevitable and in order to avoid it, recognition and acceptance corporation ease its consequences and effects. As commerce melodic phrase volition affect organisational shipment, and this result directly lead to the execution of employees and volition overly affect the firms performance. Thats why organizations deport to reduce the tensity on its employees.An proterozoic(a) important topic in organisational research is organizational shipment. It tail be used in the understanding of employees demeanour in the movementplace. organic lawal allegiance imitates the stratum to which employees identify with an organization and atomic number 18 loyal to its goals. Meta-analysis studies revealed a wellnessy positive sexual intercourseship surrounded by organizational loading and put-on contentment (Tett and Meyer, 1993). On the former(a)wise occur, some studies piece that 38 percent lone(prenominal) of employees jazz a hanker-term lading to their readyplace. However organizations with extremely connected employees volition mystify a higher productivity than an organization with a non pull employees (YUSOB, 1999)The lead variables, excogitate try, rent out satisfaction and fealty to the organization ar grapping the prudence of the organizational behavior research, these organizational behaviors directly and strongly affect the general performance of either institution. (Chen, Silverthorne, Hung, 2005243). One of the most rhytidoplas ty lines is job emphasis that consequences in significant costs to solveers and the wager sleeper around the globe, and it is the main reason for employees job satisfaction and organizational loyalty (Khatibi, Asadi and Hamidi, 2009272). to a greater extent or less limitations and gaps spend a penny been found. Most of the studies on job focusing focussed only on the effect of job stress on job satisfaction or organizational cargo or as yet on the organization performance. For example Sullivan Bahgat (1992) investigate the relation amongst the organizational stress with job satisfaction and performance .Fairbrother and caution (2003) applied a research to examine the strong relation amidst stress, dimensions of drawplace and job satisfaction. Chen, Silverthorne Hung (2006) studied the effect of commitment and organizational chat on job stress and job performance. Khatibi, Asadi Hamidi (2009) examined the connection among job stress and organizational commitment in National Olympic and Paralympic Academy (NOPA) employees. But they didnt specify either sectors, like the labor productivity in Egypt or in any other countries. So the Research Question of the Research Gap is what is the effect of job stress on job satisfaction and organizational commitment on Egyptian labor?The research question of the paper is What is the effect of job stress on job satisfaction and organizational commitment? since job stress these days is inevitable effect in any corporation because of the current life difficulties, and it might affect employees job satisfaction and organizational commitment, which may lead to the termination of employees and this will have a ruthless impact on the organization performance which will affect the organization as a whole.The paper is incorporateed of four main segments. The beginning(a) segment is an overview on job stress its definition, sources and aims. The second segment is an overview on job satisfaction definition, variab les and importance. The third segment is an overview on organizational commitment definition, types and factors affecting it. The last segment will examine the impact of job stress on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Then ultimately the mannerology will be discussed fol paltryed by the conclusion.Literature ReviewOverview on job stressThe job stress is indirectly proportionate with the organizational commitment and the job performance , whenever the employee is more committed to the organization , the job stress will cliff, thus the job performance will sum up and debility versa. . (Chen, Silverthorne, Hung, 2005243), a raising problem of handling stress at work is being faced by personals and their institutions however, they be vulnerable because they drive to understand the nature of their job-related stress (Williams, Cooper, 1998306). One risk that should grab the attention of managers and they should be responsive to cast out factors oftentimes(prenomi nal)(prenominal) as job stress that have a negative effects on employees health and as a result it has a unconstructive effect on job satisfaction and job performance. (Hamidi and Eivazi, 2010964).Definition of job stressAccording to Hamidi and Eivazi (2010 964) work stress is defined as the condition where some features or a assemblage of characteristics that disturb the employee on his/her visible, mental, or societal homeostasis. Furthermore, Williams, Cooper (1998 307) acknowledge that job Stress, which can be measured by some mingled measures such as mental physical condition, nervousness, and job satisfaction, is a complicated, multivariate process. Also ( lee Shin 2005, 100) agreed that job stress is the condition of stilted fatigue and sarcasm that happens repeatedly between entities who do people work (leeward Shin 2005, 100).Sources of job stressIn the workplace in that location argon many reasons for employees job stress one of the main reasons is the work const ipate, employees concur a breather at the organization for a lot of time working(a) to plough their jobs on their deadlines. While executives pay no attention for the stress and save they inquire more work from employee to do (Shahu and Gole, 2008 238)In our life in that respect ar many important parts job life is one of those parts. It causes different types of stress. Competitive nature of the jobs leads employees to be more worried and send packing more time in their work this considered a reason for stress. mostly employees be more anxious about their results and outcomes in their work, this way turn their treatments with people and with their customers as well. As the paper showed before stress is touch with environmental conditions which invented to present the demand that frightens to exceed the persons abilities. Stress leads a negative impact to the organization, so the employees and their boss should understand the causes or the sources of stress (Abdullah and ahsan 2009 121-122). at that place argon different variables that have major effect on job stress. Those variables argon percentage ambiguity, role divergence, work overload, and job-induced anxiety. Role conflict and role ambiguity are related to organizational and mortal consequences. Role ambiguity is a degree that obvious data is lacking concerning three steps. The first of all told step is the probabilities related to a role. The second step is the techniques used to attain role expectations and probabilities. The third step is the role performance outcomes. Role ambiguity may be caused by unstable expectations and probabilities. Role conflict happened when a person meets the immediate incidence of role requirements where personal performance prevents the others performance. proceed overload shows too much work and responsibilities that exceed persons ability. stage business-induced anxiety is the degree that individuals know how the indication and signs of worry abou t their work position and mass (Li and Shani 1991 108-109). clientele stress is a result of organizational portions, working for long hours, lack of organizational support and organizational change. Lack of support from supervisors and colleagues, and conflict with demands and pressures can lead to increasing job stress. thither are other sources of job stress, scrimpy staffing, and long working hours. Responsibility schedules which are in conflict with time for family, projectile field responsibility, deployments, threat of military disciplines, problem with supervisors and a wide diversity of other job related matters and problems. train overload, work design, job qualifications, job performance and organizational body structure are indicators of job stress. This plain also added other sources of job stress which are work dimension factors which include lack of clearness of the work role, and tumult of personal life and every day routines (Bokti and Abu Talib 2009 301). at th at place are three different make fors that have great impact on creating stress. The first influence is personal influence it confirmed that the feature of the married kind will arbitrate the effects of job insecurity (Wilson and Larson 1993 74). upset wages or salaries, bad environment in work such as low social support and high workload, and high direct of stress, those are factors that make employees leave their work and positions. While, getting recognition in the workplace was one of the reasons that make employees to continue in their jobs (Abualrub and Al-Zaru 2008 228).Work overload related to the inwardness of stress practiced by people because of the awareness which they are can non deal with the quantity and the amount of required work allocated to them. deal are expected to practice strain when they are expected to work hard and do more than the available time that allow them to do. some other source of job stress is lack of autonomy. This source is related to t he insight of the control of decision making. This is because of the limitations of job or the workplace. The person is expected to experience stress when there is inter awaitence between the tasks of individual and the tasks of other people. There are other different sources of stress broken or get aroundsighted affinitys with work colleagues will leas to high directs of stress. Unfair management will consider a potential source of stress. The jobs basic nature could be a source of stress. This study confirmed that lack of challenging and meaningful tasks, physical working circumstances is considered aspects of the job that may augment stress (Coetzee and Villiers 201030). logical argument stress is an adaptive reply happening in the workplace. Its reply is liaise by the characteristics of individuals and mediated by the psychological processes. In many occupational situations are now usually identified in educational situations. A lot of top stressors associated positively to the limitations of time. Time pressures, work overload and interpersonal dealinghips were major stressors among universitys staff. Conflict happens among teaching scholarship and the responsibility of service were highly ranked as stressful condition. wrinkle stress increases with greater overt service expectations included faculty members rank, type of institution and gender (Thorsen 1996474).Universitys teachers stress related to phenomena as poor physical comfort, mental ill-health and intention to leave. didactics is considered as a demanding profession. There is bad impact of job stress between teachers on their well being and the behavior of work. Stress between universitys teachers leads to burnout. University teachers who practice and understand higher demands on their attention, energy, and time than others, whereas getting few prizes and recompenses, they become estranged from their work lives (Taris and Schreurs 2001 284). Job stress should be at a suitable take aim, job stress has a negative effect on job performance of university teachers. Pressure of universitys teacher resulted from big competition, role conflict and the expectation of job which introduced in the system of education. This caused problems in schoolmaster behavior and job burnout (Cai-feng 2010 130).He and Li (2000 254) mentioned in their study that stress has sources, those sources are Social Environment, Family Condit, and workplace culture and atmosphere. Those sources lead to a rejoinder from individual, and then it causes job stress symptoms.Job efforts could be considered as stressor, it placed depend on the workplace and the deadlines of collisions. Job efforts have a direct relation with stress in the workplace, when it increases stress take aim increases also and vise versa. Job reward which is the real wages, categorized into three different mechanisms. The three mechanisms are personal monetary need, personal social need, and finally personal flirt with o n and off the work environment. Job reward has a negative relationship with job stress (Rehman and Khan 201043).Levels of job stressThe certifiable difference between the requirement of the environment and the abilities of the individual is what stress means. Job stressor factor is divided into three main sectors. The first one is individual factor second one is job factor or group factor and finally organizational factor. Job factors and specific job responsibilities structure the job, the ecological work factors and those factors that is associated to work plan comprise some variables, such as job duties diversity, job difficulty, temperature, noise, and the train autonomy and control that workers have on their technique and speed on their job (Khatibi, Asadi and Hamidi, 2009272).Individual levelSome studies have been found that individuals stressors are the most important level than other levels. Several individual stressors are the lack of social support,Individuals stressor f actors have been studied more than other levels role conflict, role ambiguity, volume overload of work, embarrassment changes, the quality of interpersonal relationships, lack of social support and constitution type. Those stressor factors that are attri anded to organizational factors are cultural and management practicing within the organization, non-participation in decision making, inappropriate and inadequate communication, totalitarian attractership style, organizational policies, insufficient opportunities for advancement, lack of job security which play a role in making stress. Job stress with any model needs the signs to recognize. (Khatibi, Asadi and Hamidi, 2009272).There are three different influences that have great impact on creating stress. The first influence is personal influence it confirmed that the feature of the marital relationship will arbitrate the effects of job insecurity (Wilson and Larson 1993 74). Low wages or salaries, bad environment in work such as low social support and high workload, and high level of stress, those are factors that make employees leave their work and positions. While, getting recognition in the workplace was one of the reasons that make employees to continue in their jobs (Abualrub and Al-Zaru 2008 228).Group levelOrganizational levelThe person environment fit model concerns with both main variables. The two variables are the individual characteristics of the worker and the organizational qualities of the work environment. In this Model, job stress is supposed to arise from an oddity between the environment and the person. This model showed the inconsistency in fit is a stressor. subject issues will lead to psychological and physiological strain and strain is any psychological or physiological variation from what is usual for the person. Bad person environment fit could create a high risk to the employees (Blix and Lee 1991 290).Stress-related illnessesA considerable relationship between level of peoples s tress and abhorrent reaction has been found in some therapeutic researches, such as mental distress, sleep disorders and heart disease which may lead to the increase in the rate of absenteeism and that affect the employees job performance and as a result the organization in general will be affected. (Hamidi and Eivazi, 2010964).Overview on Job satisfactionBaker College (200431-32) stated that the emotive reaction to the job satisfaction is reflected by the constructive emotional condition, that defines the term job satisfaction. Job satisfaction is accompanied with two effects either absenteeism or turnover. Job satisfaction is considered a perfect predictor of employee absenteeism or turnover.Definition of job satisfactionJob satisfaction defined by Lambert (2004, p.210) as the amount of which the workers like their job. While Lambert, Barton, and Hogan (1999, p.97) defined job satisfaction as the gratification of peoples need that linked to their work. Camp (1994) and Lambert (20 04) mentioned that employees job satisfaction can be measured by the satisfaction from pay, promotion, work, supervision, and coworkers. On the other hand Glisson Durick (1988) mentioned that job satisfaction is attached to a nonher five extra measurements which are task significance, skill variety, task identity, independence, and feedback.Sources of job satisfactionSome paraphernalia may cause the employees satisfaction or dissatisfaction. The major factors that get along and satisfy them are wages, chances, raises, bonuses, working hours, environment, communication and relationship with their peers and supervisors. In assenting to the availability of resources indispensable to achieve their jobs and tasks, one more thing is the intricacy in the decision making process (Adeyemo, 2007 325).Researches agreed that culture, race, education, age, residence and relatives can affect employees job satisfaction. For example the groups of workers who didnt complete their education or even didnt graduate from a high school are more in all probability to be very genial from those who graduate, also the younger employees or workers are least likely to be fulfilled than the older ones. African Americans workers are more likely to be satisfied than Hispanic workers.Also there are some other sources that may affect job satisfaction negatively or positively like for example the employees that dont show their emotions are more likely to be very fulfilled with each and every increase in the emotional control. On the other hand, employees that come across violence from customers or the members of the family are less likely to be much fulfilled with each and every increase of the abuse occurrences (Delp et al, 2010929).Monetary limitations that leaping the contact with health veneration can significantly reduce job fulfillment. There are three main reasons that illuminate the impact of meeting of the physicians. Firstly, the insufficient health aids that dont protect all workers or all costs. Secondly, there is no sick leave that requires workers to sacrifice their salaries when they miss their work for health arrangements. Finally, there are no support respite care workers which will force them to choose between disregard their own health requirements or leaving consumers and caring for themselves (Delp et al, 2010933-934).Importance of job satisfactionJob satisfaction is a must in any organization, since employees with low level of job satisfaction create a lot of unwanted and adverse behaviors within the organization like for example wasting the organization working hours doing some personal duties, emotional and actual retirements from their jobs, and other changes that change the work environment (Camp, 1994) in (Getahun, Sims Hummer 1). Some other negative results is related with low level of job satisfaction such as the early insularitys, absenteeism and attendance problems, and the absence of involvement in job tasks.Overview on organ izational commitment more researchers concentrated on the association between employees job satisfaction and organizational commitment. They showed that job role encounter and uncertainty have no effect on the organizational commitment in law, but they revealed the presence of the positive relationship between organizational commitment and leader provision, group cohesiveness and promotion chances (Jaramillo, Nixon Sams, 2005).Definition of organizational commitmentOrganization commitment and job commitment have been studied (Koslowsky, 1990 167-168). Organization commitment can be simply defined as the level at which the employee attracted to the organization while job commitment is the level at which the employee attracted to the job (Bashaw Grant 1994 43). Job commitment describes how people feel towards their duties and tasks. One can be committed to the organization without being committed to his job and vice versa (Freund Zahavy, 2007 322). Workers can be more satisfied with their jobs and loyal to their organization by raising their empowerment as a result they will alter their performance as well as the organizations performance (Gallie et al, 2009 2).Types of organizational commitmentThere are three types of organizational commitment affective, continuous, and prescriptive. In the words of Allen and Meyer (1990 3) employees with strong affective commitment remain because they want to, those with strong continuance commitment because they need to, and those with strong normative commitment because they feel they ought to do so.Affective commitmentAccording to (Solinger, Olffen Roe, 2008 72) affective commitment was defined as the sentimental link between the employee and the organization, in which the employee is attached to the company it also comprises employees involvement in the organization as well as their recognition with it. Affective commitment represents satisfied and pleased feelings of employees towards their jobs. Indeed affective com mitment can be described as the willingness of the employee to stay in the organization because he wants to as said by Allen and Meyer (1990 3). Also (Turner Chelladurai, 2005195) agreed that affective commitment imitates an emotional affection to the organization as an objective not to the action of staying or leaving the organization. Consequently, affective commitment greatest forecaster is the emotional agreeable involvement of work.Continuance commitmentContinuous commitment was defined by (Solinger, Olffen Roe, 2008 72) as the supplementary cost paid by the employee after leaving the company, this resembles with the utilitarian outcomes that consists of penalties and rewards that are supposed to follow from attractive in the demeanour (Eagly Chaiken, 1993 209). Continuous commitment is the attitude toward a behaviour not headed for the organization. It reveals the deliberation of outcomes of action whether to remain or leave in the organization. In other words as Meyer Allen (1990) that employee with a strong continuous commitment remain in the organization because he needs to. normative commitmentNormative commitment is the state of the employee where he feels responsible to stay in the organization (Solinger, Olffen Roe, 2008 72).Normative outcomes concern to approval or reprehension that significant others are expected to express after performing the behaviour as well as the self-administered rewards (pride) and punishments (guilt) that follow from internalized moral rules (Solinger, Olffen Roe, 2008 72)In fact employees that are characterized by normative commitment feel that they should stay in the organization and that they have to carry on their work. Normative commitment is a value where similarity between employees and organizational values might take place. (Turner Chelladurai, 2005195)Factors affect organizational commitmentChen, Silverthorne Hung (2005) mentioned that not only the job stress that affects the level of organizationa l commitment but also organizational communication has a substantial and affirmative relationship with organizational commitment. They also found that organizational intervention and personal predisposition can influence organizational commitment.Organizational interventionPersonal predispositionImportance of organizational commitmentOne of the key factors that affect productivity is organizational commitment that increases the performance that leads to a higher productivity as well as the employees are loyal and committed to their jobs in addition to job satisfaction. Therefore organizational commitment leads to the job satisfaction and motivation which affect productivity (Eaton, 2003 148).(Gallie et al 2009) also believed that workers who are highly committed to their organizations can increase their results because they will be more likely to work hard, they may also decrease their absence as for example in Google organization people are less likely to be absent because they are highly committed to their jobs and organizations and they may not leave their jobs.In contrast employees who have no other choices rather than staying in the organization may have a negative effect on productivity as he is not committed to his organization or to his job in addition he may affect his other employees resulting in fewer outcomes (Eaton, 2003 148).The impact of job stress on job satisfaction and organizational commitmentMany researchers found that in one hand, job stress is indirectly proportional with job satisfaction. On the other hand, they found that between organizational commitment and job satisfaction positive relationship. As a result, it is rational to have a negative relationship between job stress and organizational commitment (Khatibi, Asadi and Hamidi, 2009273).Low organizational commitmentMany researchers concluded in their researches that there is a significant relationship between job stress and the whole organizational commitment. Extra investigation d isplays that there is also a relationship between the affective and continuous commitment with job stress but they didnt find any clear link between job stress and normative commitment (Ziauddin et al, 2010 617). While Somers on the other hand stated that there is a relationship between affective and normative commitment with job stress, but no clear link between continuous commitment and job stress. Also Khatibi, Asadi Hamidi (2009 272) agreed with Somers that there is a negative significant relationship between job stress and organizational commitment, affective commitment and normative commitment, but there was not a significant relationship between job stress and continuance commitment.Lee et al stated that there is an adverse relation between job stress and organizational commitment, while wells et al (2009) on the other hand revealed in his study that there is a positive relationship between job stress and organizational commitment and an adverse relationship between job stre ss and job commitment. Yaghoubi et al disagreed with all these relations and declared that there is no significant relationship between organizational commitment and job stress, he then added that it is important for any organization to have healthy and committed employees as well as frolic organizations as ther are not exceptions.Job dissatisfaction and termination of employeeIn the short run, job stress will reduce job satisfaction that results in decreasing the rate of absences of the employees. Absenteeism is the reaction of the employees towards the feeling of being dissatisfied. While in the long run, being dissatisfied will have a huge result in increasing the rate of turnover. On the other hand, some employees may not leave the company as they buildup financial interest group which will be so difficult for them to quit the job and these financial interests may include wages, encouragements and it might be the only return to the employees family (Baker College, 200436). So whenever the employees are satisfied and committed to the organization they will have a humble tendency to leave it (Ziauddin, 2010618).Stress affect organizational outcomeSome researchers discovered that the previous and the significance of the subvert job stress leads to a higher job satisfaction and higher organizational commitment, since it will give them the feeling that the job met expectations (Moncrief et al, 1996) they also added that employees will have a lower tendency to leave the organization when they are highly satisfied and committed to the organization. (Elangovan, 2001) indicates that there are durable fundamental relations between job stress and satisfaction (where the higher the job stress the lower the job satisfaction), and between job satisfaction and organizational commitment (the lower the job satisfaction the lower the organizational commitment). He also stated that there is a mutual association between organizational commitment and turnover goals (lower organizational commitment leads to a great intention to quit).Stress is linked with some negative effects in the workplace some of them are the lack of interest for work, organization, and colleagues. It also includes absence of creativity, loss of duties, rock-bottom effectiveness, increased inflexibility of thinking, and decreased the ability of performing (Fairbrother and Warn, 2003 9). Job stress is related with significant occupational consequences of job satisfaction, organizational commitment and the withdrawal behaviour of the employees (Sullivan Bhagat, 1992). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction regularly comprehend an adverse relationship with the intent to leave and turnover (Hollenbeck and Williams, 1986).According to Fairbrother and Warn (2003 9) they stated that organizational commitment and job satisfaction have repeatedly negative relationship to intent to quit and leave the organization, since high level of job stress most of the time connected to the low level of commitment and satisfaction. The major predictive effect of dissatisfaction is job stress and it will have a great tendency to leave the organization (Landsbergis, 1988 terrycloth et al., 1993)MethodologyIn order to test the mentioned hypotheses, a quantitative method should be applied which includes questionnaires and interviews. Since we are aiming to examine the effect of job stress on job satisfaction and organizational commitment, a questionnaire will be a valid tool to draw statistical conclusions. The questionnaire will be distributed in two private manufactories one for clothing while the other one for paper and cardboards. Thus a structured face-to-face questionnaire is needed where the interviewer presents the items orally in order to clarify the main purpose of the study and the meaning of the questions, because most of labors are illiterate.The sample of the study will consist of two hundred Egyptian employees working in private manufactories in Egypt, spec ifically in Cairo for convenience. We chose private manufactories due to the easy access code to them in order to distribute the questionnaire, because it will be much more difficult to distribute the questionnaire in public organizations or