Sound Leadership Essay Example for Free

Sound leading EssayThe focus of lead and the dynamics that make up go leading drives our day to day interaction in a continuous revolving world of business. Sound leading is the core of all(prenominal) arranging and solving its problems. Understanding attractions, its purpose, and dynamics enables executives to solve problems and maintain a competitive edge in a continuously changing business environment. In order to address the strategical implications that organisational doingss curb on leading, justify the business needs of leading, and codify the implications lead has on organisational drifts this paper impart focus on the definition of different lead trends and sufficees, how they furbish up to organisational demeanours indoors an physical composition, and how they form fit leadershiphip. 14. November 2011Throughout this course we throw focused a significant amount of condemnation talk abouting an organizational moment. The majority of the is sues and solutions in every organizational moment evolved around leadership. Whether it was an absence of leadership or a directional change in leadership, leadership was at the core of every situation presented in the readings. Leadership is a behavior. The way an organization employs leadership,controls a variety of influences that guides the partys direction. The focus of leadership and the dynamics that make up sound leadership drives our day to day interaction in forthwiths world of business. Sound leadership is the core of every organization and solving its problems.Understanding leadership, its purpose, and dynamics enables executives to solve problems and maintain a competitive edge. In order to address the strategic implications that organizational behaviors require on leadership, justify the business needs of leadership, and codify the implications leadership has on organizational behaviors this paper willing focus on the defining different leadership ardours and proc esses, examine how they relate to organizational behaviors inwardly an organization, and how they take a leak to form sound leadership.According to Beebe Masterson (2006), leadership tendency is a relatively consistent pattern of behavior reflecting a leaders beliefs and attitudes. It is the beliefs and attitudes that leadership forms toward the strategic goals of an organization that determines the direction of the company. In order for an organization to be successful they bewilder to have buy-in. For an organization to have buy-in it establishes strategic goals that shape the direction of the organization. The leadership having buy-in, aligning their beliefs and attitudes toward the strategic goals of the organization, and relaying their beliefs and attitudes to their employees shapes the direction of the organization and provide a solid foundation for the organization to be successful. Leadership drives the mission of an organization and in order to impart these beliefs on their employees, leaders practice triple basic leadership styles.Leadership styles determine the atmosphere of the organization. Understanding leadership and the many methods to employ it is as quintessential to an organization as its resources. According to Beebe and Masterson (2006), no two people practice the same methods of leadership however, all people lead with three basic leadership styles authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire(prenominal). For this paper, it is not master(prenominal) to understand the definitions of severally type of leadership style as it is to understand the fact that leadership styles determine the atmosphere and organizational behavior a company employs. Under authoritarian leadershipthe leader dictates the work and tasks for each member.Members within an authoritarian leadership group ar dependent on the leader to make decisions, ar unable(predicate) of independent thought, and have difficulty navigating issues that arise within an organiz ation. In democratic leadership leaders have more faith in the group and attempt to involve members in making decisions. Democratic leadership style encourages the development of employees, empowers members by involving them in the decision making process, and leaders provide the necessary fight to allow the success of members. Laissez-faire leaders avoid dominating the group and assume the group will direct itself. Laissez-faire behavior is a complete avoidance of leading.These non-leaders completely abdicate their leadership section and refuse to make decisions. This is a manager who is relatively inattentive, indifferent, frequently absent, and uninfluential (Humphreys, 2001). These leadership styles greatly daze an organization and directly contribute to the directions and futures of a business. Leadership styles develop the persona leaders exude in managing their people. Leadership idealogues incorporated processes into leadership to explain how leadership styles impact th e procedure of workers within an organization.Theorists have do their mark in the world of business. Over the past decades, researchers focused on defining the personal traits of rough-and-ready leaders but ultimately concluded that it is not so much the traits as it is how individuals utilize these traits (Boseman, 2008). Theorists have focused their efforts toward understanding the processes of leadership to assist managers with leading their people and achieving the organizations goals. Abraham Maslow, Clayton Alderfer, Victor Vroom, Edwin Locke, atomic number 1 Landsberger, Frederick Taylor, Paul Hersey, Ken Blanchard, Robert House, and Douglas McGregor studies in leadership have made major contributions to the world of business. Of these prolific theorists Maslows power structure of Needs, Alderfers ERG Theory, Houses Path-Goal Theory, and Hersey and Blanchards Situational Leadership will be utilized to explain how leadership effect organizational behaviors.Abraham Maslows introduce his concept of leadership in 1943. MaslowsHierarchy of Needs was maked on motivational leadership. Maslows leadership concept is derived from the concept of a benefit with five levels of employee needs physiological needs, safety needs, love/belonging needs, esteem needs, and self-actualization needs. Clayton Alderfer, later in 1969, rewrite Maslows Hierarch of Needs into three categories existence needs, relatedness needs, and growth needs. According to the studies of some(prenominal) theorists it is important for a leader to understand the needs of their people to effectively lead and motivate. Through their studies, these pi unmatchableers of leadership have launch that the understanding that leaders have of their employees needs directly effects organizational behaviors and accomplishment of company goals and objectives.In 1971 Robert Houses introduce Path-Goal Theory. According to Lyons (2007), an effective leader is one who can assistance carve a path for subor dinates that allow them to fulfill personal goals through the progress toment of group and organizational goals. In path-goal theory a leader adopts either a directive, supportive, participative, or securement oriented leadership style to accomplish this objective.The leadership style performed is dependent on two variables characteristics of the employee and characteristics of the work environment. Based on both variables the leader practices directive, supportive, participative, or achievement oriented leadership. The leadership style practiced ensures the needs of the employee are fulfilled and organizational goals and objectives can be met. Houses path-goal theory is a needs base process that shapes the organizational behavior of an organization.Hersey and Blanchards situational leadership developed in 1974 distinguishes between quaternity leadership styles that are characterized by a combination of task and relationship.Telling High task, low relationship styleSelling High t ask, high relationship styleParticipating Low task, high relationship styleDelegating Low task, low relationship style(Hitt, Miller, Colella, 2011)DeCaro, DeCaro Bowen-Thompson (2010) stated, The model is useful in determining if a persons leadership style is relationship or task oriented and if the situation such as task structure and leader members relationship, match the leaders style to maximize performance. Utilizing situational leadership a leader can accommodate an employees needs by varying their own behavior and applying the most suitable style for a given situation. By varying leadership style found on the employees needs a leader can manage organizational behaviors and achieve organizational goals and objectives.As one can see leadership and organizational behaviors work hand in hand. They both influence one another to meet the strategic goals and objectives of an organization. Hitt, Miller, Colella (2011), stated the strategic organizational behavior commence relie s on the premise that people are the foundation of an organizations competitive advantage. As leaven to this, leadership theorists developed processes base on the people within the organization. The processes developed guided organizational leaders in achieving the companys goals and objectives. People and the leadership that shape the direction and culture of an organization drama a vital role in establishing an organizations organizational behaviors. Leadership is the quality to achieve desired conduces by giving the proper direction to the organization (Giri Santra, 2010). The influence that leadership and organizational behaviors have on a business establishes leadership as a critical and most vital plus an organization can employ.Throughout the eight weeks of this course we analyze an organizational behavior moment that discussed leadership struggles within organizations. The leadership struggles faced in the organizational moments relay the importance of leadership withi n an organization. In the case study, Bright and Dedicated What more can you ask for? Anita Lockwood is a perfect example of an of import leader. Anita rules with an iron fist over Susanand her employees. Anita never empowers Susan to run the finance department and as a result Susans leadership development is hindered.The importance of Anitas and Susans moment in organizational behavior is it displays the effects that authoritarian leadership style has and how it impacts others. In an authoritative leadership environment the organizational goals and objectives are met, however at the expense of the professional development of people within the organization. In situational leadership it is sometimes necessary to practice authoritative leadership in order to stimulate the growth during the training process of learning a new job or position. Once the training process is over it is important that the leader is able to variety out of the authoritative leadership style and into one that continues to allow their personnel office to grow and develop within the organization.The Two Presidents is another organization moment that provides an example of the importance of leadership to business. In this case study Alvin Thomas displays the attributes of a democratic leader. Alvin exhibits an active role of leadership, empowers his employees to make decisions, and establishes goals and objectives based on organizational dynamics. Thomass leadership allows the university, the people around him, and himself to prosper due to his style of leadership. A democratic leadership style broods balance and creates a positive environment that allows a leader to be directive, supportive, participative, or achievement oriented when necessary. The importance of this characteristic is the leader understanding their employees. Understanding employees enables leaders to meet the needs of their employees and companies to maintain their competitive edge.The last organizational moment that I would like to discuss in support of the argument of why leadership is important to business is A Sea throw in Staffing at Leapfrog Innovations, Inc. In this case study Dick Eaton dons the role of a laissez-faire leader. Dicks hands-off approach failed him miserably in the end. Due to his negligence his company undergo a high turn-over rate of personnel and had no foundation for stability once the three long-time employees begun to transition to other opportunities.This left Dick holding the bag per say and his company in shambles with nodirection and a bleak future. Dicks experience was an extreme case of laissez-faire leadership. in that location are instances where this style of leadership is appropriate. Laissez-faire leadership is appropriate when personnel are performing and confluence the expectations of the leader and goals of the organization. In Dicks case he was a laissez-faire leader from beginning to end. He took a huge gamble in placing all his faith in the leaders hip of one individual to run his company and when they decided to leave the experience, knowledge base, and foundation of his company left also. terce different case studies, three different leadership styles, and three different outcomes the key theme to line of credit in each case is the importance of leadership. Leadership is one of the key fundamental building blocks of travel rapidly a business and is as quintessential to an organization as its resources. According to Giri Santra (2010), Leadership is the quality to achieve desired results by giving proper direction to the organization. In order to achieve the desired results leaders utilize motivation to motivate employees toward achieving the organizations harsh goal. The assumption that leadership is a effectuate of behaviors that can actually be observed, measured, and developed is critical to the development of any process (Kanji, 2008).Leadership theorist understood the importance of leadership to business and develo ped processes to assist leaders in understanding what motivates people. for each one topic discussed in this paper depicts the basics of leadership. The purpose for this paper was to understand how leadership affects business and relates to organization behaviors. The organizational behaviors a company employs and the practice of leadership has a significant impact on the strategic implications of an organization. Business challenges effects every industry and creates vast opportunities to establish sound organization behaviors to support sound leadership. It is paramount that the organizational behaviors that a company employs support its leadership. In summary there are four key points to note in the importance of leadership to a businessa. Leadership styles vary in types and it is important that businesses adopt practices that best fits their organization and people.b. Leadership Theorist improvements in processes that define leadership, helps organizations to understand, manage , and lead personnel.c. Leadership and Organizational behaviors work together to form sound leadership.d. Sound leadership within an organization creates a healthy work environment. The importance of leadership to an organization could mean its success or could lead to its demise.The pickaxe of leadership style is crucial to the success of business operations and hence also the ultimate performance of the company (Juhl, Kristensen, Kanji, Batley, 2000). Every business, organization, or group of people striving together to accomplish a common goal needs only one thing to be successful, Leadership At the forefront of every fortune 500 company, military, government, and country is sound leadership to meet company objectives and goals.No matter which style of leadership is practiced, it is leadership at the foundation of every organization that drives the company. The strategic implications that organizational behaviors have on leadership, codify the importance of leadership to busine ss. The implications that leadership, leadership styles, and leadership processes have on an organization directly relate to the organizational behaviors within an organization and how they assemble to establish sound leadership.ReferencesBeebe, S. A., Masterson, J. T. (2006). Communicating in Small Groups Principles and Practices, ordinal Edition. Bostin, Massachusetts Allyn and Bacon.Boseman, G. (2008). Effective Leadership in a Changing World. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 62(3), 36-38. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. DeCaro, F. P., DeCaro, N., Bowen-Thompson, F. O. (2010). An trial of Leadership Styles of Minority Business Entrepreneurs A Case Study of Public Contracts. Journal of Business scotch Studies, 16(2), 72-78. Retrievedfrom EBSCOhost. Giri, V. N., Santra, T. (2010). Effects of Job Experience, Career Stage, and Hierarchy on Leadership Style. Singapore Management Review, 32(1), 85-93. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.Hitt, M. A., Miller, C. C., Colella, A. (2011). Leadership. Organizational mien (Third Ed), CH 8, Hoboken, NJ John Wiley Sons, Inc.Humphreys, J. H. (2001). Transformational and Transactional Leader Behavior. Journal of Management Research (09725814), 1(3), 149. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Juhl, H. J., Kristensen, K. K., Kanji, G. K., Batley, T. W. (2000). Quality Management A similitude of Cultural Differences. Total Quality Management, 11(1), 57-65. doi10.1080/0954412007026 Kanji, G. K. (2008). Leadership is prime How do you measure Leadership worth? Total Quality Management Business Excellence, 19(4), 417-427. doi10.1080/14783360802002834 Lyons, P. (2007). A Leadership Development Model to better Organizational Competitiveness. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 15(1/2), 103-115. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.